18
In America we have no ideology a famous journalist aver
s the country is run entirely on common senses and gas
oline the people is plural and energetic especially
the new ones displaced from their homes in Asia the
schools are terrible the politicians trivialize serious
issues and so do the media but everything’s genetic and
In twenty years
We’ll find he two great 19th century reputations most
tarnished will be those of Marx and Freud there is no
deeply hidden and intricate motive for unhappiness hap
piness must our lot in life if some can achieve it
then all must do so research on the brain indicates we
are close very close to this universal human goal we
will be happy anyway
Beverly Dahlen from A-Reading Spicer & eighteen sonnets
Chax Press (2004)
Friday evening I went to a reading of Beverly Dahlen and Charles Alexander at the Small Press Traffic Reading series at California College of the Arts. Both read well. I was Beverly’s first publisher (Momo’s Press) in the seventies and early eighties when we published Out of the Third and A Reading (1 -7). Beverly,recently retired, worked most of her professional life as a literacy teacher in the adult education system. Much of her education in poetry first came in the sixties and seventies when she was the Secretary for the Poetry Center at SF State, where she was also for a time a student. In the eighties she was one of the founders of However (magazine) with Frances Jaffer and Kathleen Frazer, in fact Beverly was responsible for creating its counteractive name (aim). She was also close to the work of many of founding members of “language poetry” - Lyn Hejinian, Carla Harryman, Laura Moriarty, Barry Watten, Ron Silliman and Bob Perleman.
What can only be described as a “dominant intellect” - albeit a diamond in the rough, Beverly’s work ripples with echos and resonances of the poets Olson, Niedecker, Oppen, Duncan. Spicer and Stanley (among others) and the deep reading of Marx, Kristeva and Freud. What is intriguing about her work, however, is its commitment to the acknowlegement of her immediate, her present world - which is to say or ask how do all these various knowledges come down, challenge,jar or just do not make full sense as this woman who takes the bus back and forth between Portrero Hill or Bernal Heights through the Mission to the adult education center, vistis her parents in Oregon, falls in love, challenges what we call “the media”, and argues and consoles with the ghost of Spicer and other literary presences etc. etc. In her work there is no illusion or security of some blessed “other.” Though Robert Duncan was fond of her work - indeed wrote an introduction to The Egyptian Poems - there is not a transcendant bone in her body, at best, or darkest, there is a pervasive sense of betrayal - the gods will not deliver and this darkness is our travail. It is from this point that the work begins. Threaded with both intelligence and combative word play, the language emerges with an insistence - not without an intervening tenderness - to become an engaged music, indeed tormented, yet, finally,ministerial, the words driving, securing a most credible space.
Charles Alexander is not hinged in by darkmess, but one can see why Beverly’s work - it’s sense of presence - would be compelling. The differences are partly generational. If we think of Dahlen’s coming of age as that of the Fifties as defined by post-War and Samuel Beckett in spirit (a severity that has local resonance with Oppen and Spicer), Charles’ is much more animated by the hope implicit to the late sixties and seventies (albeit that was against the scrim of the Vietnam War).
In any case the belief in the present - in what it offers to the art of making books (through the vehicle of his Chax Press), his partnerships with family, and by extension the world of artists and poets - creates a work in which the particulars of the present are relished. The challenge and desire are to organize the words - those faces and mirrors - into form that is reflective and just, a music where the language engages and takes the eye from image to image, moment to moment, and to the perceptions that reveal themselves in the pattern given.
I won’t attempt to reveal the system at work in Charles’ new book, “near or random acts”, other than each poem is seven lines long, and he’s got “a round” - similar to “seven become eleven” - going with the play of numbers. Many of them appear backed by the implied chorus and spry spirits of his young daughter and her friends. In fact, the entire work may be heard as an implicit prayer, a ministry, for her well being, and, by extension, the well being what we make in and of the present world.
Here are a couple of examples with the proviso that individual pieces are not written with “big bang closure”; to the contrary, the little works are each a weave - cumulative increments- to the line and texture of a larger weave, and yet of that, too, the book - as woven spiral - is only a partial container among many:
56
raspberies along the fence outside
the house with three levels
rapsberries in the basket held
by girl walking barely now
raspberries on the girls face
empty basket tells a tale
of the history of raspberries
53
The racial epithet does not
win the contest that goes
from north to wherever poles
give way to climate we
want to give it up
but somewhere someone very scared
takes another breath and holds
From near or random acts by Charles Alexander
Singing Horse Press (2004)